Masters of Cinema - Latest Comments

Re: Adrian Brody (The Pianist)

jula — Sun, 12 May 2013 08:17:37 -0000

moving film :)

Re: Review: Zero Dark Thirty

Rohan Mohmand — Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:41:21 -0000

Indeed. The Hurt Locker was much emotional, Travlis. The very gravity of this film's subject to us all and every single person, who lost their loved ones due to Bin Laden's evil deeds, I am sure at the end when he was killed, all those families, not only in the U.S., but around the world, had some relief from emotion and sadness due to losing someone dear. I am looking forward to the Oscar night. This will be tough to beat.

Re: Review: Zero Dark Thirty

Travlis Hallingquest — Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:54:19 -0000

Great review as always Rohan. I liked the film, but it was not as emotionally involving as "The Hurt Locker" which also had better character development. But the technical prowess and wise camera angle choices by Ms. Bigelow make up for the emotional void. Also the acting was quite stellar.

Re: The Cinematic Anger

Rohan Mohmand — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:52:26 -0000

I agree with your point in regards to Leonard using his anger to drive him to find and kill his wife's killer. He's not angry at the entire world. Since the idea of such character and his problems were put on paper by Jonathan and then Chris, do you think Chris as writer and director was angry at such idea? Do we as artists use our anger and sentiments and come up with tragic story and characters?

Re: The Cinematic Anger

Travlis Hallingquest — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:07:11 -0000

Great article Rohan. There is a difference between a film that is about anger and its consequences and a movie that glorifies anger. That's the difference between John Singleton's "Boyz N THe Hood" and the derivative knock-offs that line the crime movie listings in Netflix.

In Christopher Nolan's "Memento" Leonard Shelby uses anger to drive him to find and kill (or so he makes himself believe) the murderer of his wife. He was not angry at the entire world but at the killer. It was the love of his wife that channeled his anger.

Re: Movie Review: ‘The Master’ is Groundbreaking

Travlis Hallingquest — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:05:56 -0000

I would like to see IMAX used for more than just action, although Nolan superbly used it in TDK and TDKR. Thanks, Rohan.

Re: Movie Review: ‘The Master’ is Groundbreaking

Rohan Mohmand — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:08:25 -0000

Travlis,
Production design, especially when it comes to costumes are artful. Picked very delicately. Cinematography of the film is gorgeous. P.T. Anderson's love for the IMAX camera really shows. Audiences see the atmosphere outside. Anderson has shot lots of scene in outdoor, places like Bakersfield, Bay Area and it shows the beauty of these terrains, fields, beach, water/ocean. I am very glad that Anderson chose to shoot the film with IMAX cameras. This makes him the only director who used the IMAX instruments to shoot a film that doesn't have action sequences. Nolan used the IMAX to capture the action sequences of The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises. Anderson, I see why he used these cameras. Besides capturing the beauty and scenery; he chose to show rage, performances of his actors more clear, close and personal with the audience.

Re: Movie Review: ‘The Master’ is Groundbreaking

Travlis Hallingquest — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:03:08 -0000

Rohan, can you tell a little more (without giving away too much plot) about the production design and cinematography? Were the IMAX cameras necessary? Good review as always.

Re: Critiquing the Critics of Christopher Nolan

Rohan Mohmand — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:29:38 -0000

The very point of this article, if perceived thoroughly, isn't an unsound argument. There is more to a great director than technology, yes, but no. I believe film-makers should always push the bouundary of technology. Pave the way for younger and freshmen. Cameron is pushing the 3D, Peter Jackson is locked with the idea of 48fps presentation. The article is not only pointing 'technology doctrine' (that Nolan brought IMAX cameras) the director's contribution is more than just the IMAX technology.

Re: Critiquing the Critics of Christopher Nolan

Anonyman — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:24:59 -0000

I am not even a Nolan hater, but this article reeks of straw man fallacy. Yes, Nolan is pushing the Imax format, but there is more to a great director than technology. I think a more thoughtful approach would be to find Nolan's lowest ranking movies, and refute the accusations against them. The fact is Nolan films tend to have lengthy exposition, weaker female characters, and run of the mill action scenes. Huddleston is trying to explain his opinion on why he should not be as revered as Kubrik. I think an article piece should not reflect the opinions of the masses, but carve its own distinction. Defend Nolan's editing style and cinematic prose. But don't just say he's different because he motivates the audience to think. That is not really any more distinct than what most fans say about him.

17 things wrong with Inception is a fascinating read, even though I like the movie.

Re: Critiquing the Critics of Christopher Nolan

Rohan Mohmand — Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:28:31 -0000

You have to give us a little more detail on why you think Nolan's films aren't very good.

Re: Critiquing the Critics of Christopher Nolan

Brian McInnis — Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:55:03 -0000

His movies just aren't very good, that's all I'm sayin'.

Re: Critiquing the Critics of Christopher Nolan

ishanth — Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:13:26 -0000

Perfect !!!

Re: Artistic productions as the standard: Defining “classic” cinema

Travlis Hallingquest — Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:30:42 -0000

Mike, I can definitely tell that you have a history background, due to the way you explained how something can be modern and classic. And history is more about why than when and your writing backed up all of the points that you made. Why something is a classic is more relevant that when it was produced. There are dozens of films from 1939 but none as memorable as "Gone With The Wind, "The Wizard of Oz", and "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington".

Re: The Village: The Innocence of Art

Fabian Alvarado — Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:02:22 -0000

Excelente artículo, yo defiendo está película al máximo, es una obra de arte!!!

Re: Artistic productions as the standard: Defining “classic” cinema

Rohan Mohmand — Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:58:33 -0000

Mike,

This is very well put together. I remember watching Jurassic Park when I was young, and the impact of the film is still pretty much alive in my heart. There was this anticipation of a monster feeling the whole time. Scott's Gladiator was a film that I remember watching after checking out its VHS from a public library. That's how I got introduced to Ridley Scott's work. And, Terminator was the first film of James Cameron that I watched with a friend at his home, again it was on VHS. It was all because of Arnold to be honest. Looking back, I say, I am glad I decided to watch these films. They are all true classics. Avatar is a film that defines the impact of cinema to the audience. It will be remembers and cherished forever.

Re: Point of View: Prometheus

Rohan Mohmand — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:05:25 -0000

Travlis, first of all, thank you for the comment. I am glad that you agree with me on the issue of 'creativity' in Hollywood. When you see the film, Travlis, I hope you like it as much as I did and Daniel did. There are many people, especially critics that are bashing the film because the film doesn't offer them that cold drink, because they came out thirsty. That is the beauty of the film. It's a strong film-making achievement in my opinion.

And, I am sure you will like it. :)

Re: Point of View: Prometheus

Travlis Hallingquest — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:31:19 -0000

Rohan, as you know I have not seen "Prometheus" due to the slightly later release date. Yet your point of creativity keeping Hollywood is well argued. And if someone has an issue with "Prometheus" not answering enough questions (about mankind's origin) then hopefully that criticism will inspire someone to write a movie that does attempt to answer those questions. The beauty of film is that people of all beliefs and ethnic backgrounds can enjoy a good story.

Re: Christopher Nolan, an icon; the rise of a craftsman

Rohan Mohmand — Fri, 18 May 2012 23:23:53 -0000

I also like how you started the article from his old days in school, his father and him and Jonathan's journey with Memento Mori. Very well written.

Re: Christopher Nolan, an icon; the rise of a craftsman

Travlis Hallingquest — Fri, 18 May 2012 22:50:42 -0000

Thanks Rohan. Nolan is a visionary. I admire Kubrick for his visual and technical prowess but his films are too slow and unengaging. Nolan is a mix of style and substance. He is artsy enough for critics and film lovers, but knows what to keep mainstream audiences from looking at their watches during a movie.

Re: Christopher Nolan, an icon; the rise of a craftsman

Rohan Mohmand — Fri, 18 May 2012 22:36:19 -0000

Travlis,

This is an excellent article: I enjoyed reading it not twice, but three times. Very insightful and engaging. It is a closer look on the work of a man, whose artistic work is admired not only by me, but many others. A good read.

Re: The Village: The Innocence of Art

Rohan Mohmand — Wed, 09 May 2012 11:48:00 -0000

Thank you for reading, Juan.

Re: The Village: The Innocence of Art

Juan — Tue, 08 May 2012 17:23:49 -0000

Good article.

Re: Kathryn Bigelow’s ‘Bin Laden’ film obtains working title; Production angers some in India

Rohan — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:07:12 -0000

Thank you, Travlis. Me, too. I want their safety and hope they finish the scene safely anywhere they are going to shoot.

Re: Kathryn Bigelow’s ‘Bin Laden’ film obtains working title; Production angers some in India

Travlis Hallingquest — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:31:26 -0000

Great Article Rohan, from a cinematic and world news perspective. I hope that the crew remains safe while filming.